2016-2017 Series/Volume


HOME | DOING AWAY WITH THE "ISSUE" | THE PREVIOUS SERIES/VOLUMES | ABOUT US | CONTACT US



advertisements

 


 

Uploaded November 6, 2017

REVIEW


 

The Other Within our Selves

on an encounter with a unique mini-show at AltroMondo at The Picasso Boutique

 


 



diskurso.com had a peek at the space of the smallish cozy nook of a gallery called AltroMondo at The Picasso (at The Picasso Boutique Serviced Residences along Leviste Street in Salcedo Village, Makati) and witnessed a little show, called Otherness, with a potential for a big version of it

 

This review is as much a result of diskurso.com’s own take on the show as of our interview with the artists conducted by Jojo Soria de Veyra
and Marcel Antonio at the University of the Philippines College of Fine Arts

 

 

 

 


 

 

ANTHROPOLOGY is all about the Other. And even when this social science concerns itself with selves, with the Us, it is its tradition to look at that Us subject mentally from Above, or from Without, even while it realizes its own ready and mundane immersion within this subject’s psychological being, this subject’s Us-ness, or Me-ness within that Us. Thus, it looks—or makes that effort to look—at this Us, or this I within the Us, as an Other.
    It is from this awareness of anthropological distance that we found this little, almost obscure, show curated by anthropologist and painter Poch Naval, titled Otherness, to be of such large potential for a bigger show that we wish it was truly just a pilot show aiming for a broader stroke in a larger space, involving substantially more than the four artists in the mini-show that we found hidden at that nook of a gallery called AltroMondo at The Picasso Boutique. It had been there since September 28, closing only yesterday, November 5; the pieces will remain at the gallery's "virtual backroom" for half a year from today, however, to continue to be available to patrons.
    Let us illustrate what we expressed as the potential of this show—for a bigger Otherness event—simply by decoding for you how the phenomenological concept of “otherness” displayed itself in each of the four participants in this group exhibition and how their collective “otherness” shaped itself for a context bigger than each of the four.

Raul Rodriguez, active as a painter since 1988 and supposedly coming back into the art market only now after disappearing from the scene in 1998 (an absence cut only by a surprise Magnet Gallery one-man show of drawings in 2006), joins Naval here by culling a David Salle image-making mannerism from the 1980s for five canvases, that is to say, dividing his canvas space into planes for collage-like juxtaposition of Rorschachiana. Each plane presents imagery at the border between the abstract and the referential, its relationship with its neighboring plane/s itself becoming party to a bigger Rorschachian algorithm that results in emotions from the thinking (or sub-thinking) process. In other words, this manner of presenting semi-representational imagery in “split screens” leads the viewer (as it likely led the painter at the moment of creation) to a realization of a business of thinking that reveals to himself his own emotional personality; thus, he becomes himself as well as an Other who has looked at (or realized, or sub-realized) his Self.
    Note, however, that by emulating Salle-ian-like compositions and image-making methodologies Rodriguez underscores his being remote from what he says is Salle’s tendency to celebrate the self by allegorizing and narrating with what’s on the picture. Rodriguez claims to have more kinship with the formalists ab initio, process-wise, with an awareness that at the end of the operation he would have more in common with Dadaists, or with the surrealist dreamers, or otherwise with the shamanic celebrations of ordered chaos in the free jazz of John Coltrane that he alludes to in one canvas. In fact, one of his inspirations for this show’s current imagery is the subdued mood of the street horizons displayed in many of Edward Hopper's compositions.
    Most exciting to us is the piece that could be Rodriguez’s salute to structuralism and its antithesis, postructuralism, titled Structures Don’t Lie, if only because therein could be his poetics, in seeming to say that albeit the structure is truly there, inhabiting its own solid truth, in the end it’s the “post-structure” that shall define the multi-truths upon its intrinsic truth (or meaning).
    Incidentally, Rodriguez questions the claim of the tag “expressionism” as “expression”, implying this is too much concerned with the Self (or the Self-Centered Painter from the point of view of a critic). Rodriguez prefers to paint not from himself but from an absence of it, not for juxtapositions that work but preferably for ones that "don’t connect", if that's possible, perhaps for jouissance from his manufacture of "the naive".

 


Raul Rodriguez, Studio to Studio, 2017, oil and enamel on canvas, 48" x 60"


Raul Rodriguez, A Short History of Ambiguity, 2017, oil and enamel on canvas, 48" x 48"


Raul Rodriguez, Bring Peace to My Sunken Ships, 2017, oil and enamel on canvas, 36" x 48"


Raul Rodriguez, He Who Wipes the Horizon, 2017, oil and enamel on canvas, 48" x 48"


Raul Rodriguez, Structures Don't Lie, 2017, oil and enamel on canvas, 36" x 48"

 

Then there's Florence Cinco, who has in his career been working on the idea of reclaiming images of a Philippine nobility in history.
    This time, though, he comes up with small metal sculptures digging into a different set of roots, all titled Saha (which means roots), that ostensibly emulate the idea of foundations, frameworks, the basics, and roots, which together come up with an inward-looking perspective on Selves from the point of view of blueprints (draftsmen), microscopes (microbiologists), or bone examinations (forensic anthropologists, forensic archeologists). So, with this series of little pieces, he furthers his nationalist view of our Us-ness to views of anatomical architectural frameworks both living and non-living, simply by making the latter act as a reminder, or as metaphorical support for an impending nationalist discourse. And if nationalism is by itself an Other or quaint perspective in our globalized present, perhaps even fascist or royalist by liberal standards, then allusions to such stuff as our DNA helix could even be more of an Other perspective within nationalism itself.
    However, we still have to wait where else Cinco would bring his rare nationalist discourse from this point on. . . .


Florence Cinco, Saha I, 2017, metal, 75" x 15" x 9"


Florence Cinco, Saha II, 2017, metal, 10.5" x 11" x 6.5"


Florence Cinco, Saha III, 2017, metal, 12.5" x 11" x 9"


Florence Cinco, Saha IV, 2017, metal, 10.5" x 6.5" x 6.5"


Florence Cinco, Saha V, 2017, metal, 12" x 7" x 7"

 

Meanwhile, Neil Pasilan, the third man in the group, claims to be the one in this gathering with a Self more attached to Filipino mythologies, especially relating to the existence of spirits or angels. He ignores academic rules on perspective, ultimately achieving an Other world, without this world becoming of fantasy art. His world’s realism feels like the realism of folk art, which Western art would of course not categorize as realist.
    In hauling in Pasilan for the show, organizer Naval says he didn’t intend Pasilan to represent an ethnography but rather a parallel acknowledgment of the entropy-cum-mystery of human existence, with the Bacolod-based artist carrying another mode of displaying the uncategorizable Other within our inconclusive Selves.
    But while Rodriguez and Naval (more on his art later) would almost express disdain for the creative Self in order to celebrate the Other within our Selves, Pasilan extracts imagery familiar to his Self, not to celebrate this Self but, like Naval and Rodriguez, to end up underscoring or testifying to the loose context of a Self, the way it would be underscored or testified to by a not-so-haughty social science mystified by the phenomenon of existences.


Neil Pasilan, Dasal Ilonggo, 2017, mixed media on Arches paper, 43" x 29.5"


Neil Pasilan, Anino, 2017, mixed media on Arches paper, 43" x 29.5" (some images are reflections on the glass)


Neil Pasilan, Ambun, 2017, mixed media on Arches paper, 29.5" x 43"


Neil Pasilan, Moment, 2017, mixed media on Arches paper, 43" x 29.5" (some images are reflections on the glass)

 

Naval’s works, finally, are the more direct experiments with the Self’s and the Other’s image-reading. He articulates this point of experimentation by alluding to his image-making exercise as a process of drawing, erasing, re-drawing, and finally deciding—without it being a “decision”—to hold on to an image placed on an empty plane. The relatively empty canvas highlights one image’s relationship (semantical or not) with a neighboring semi-representation of an image similarly produced, emulating the doodle.
    Naval mentions the French philosopher Emmanuel Levinas as one of his inspirations for the erasures, who he says aptly described the act of erasing as a return to reality, a return to the real truth. In short, the subject of Naval's works are not so much the images he has scribbled as the act of doodling itself, within which activity resides the portrait of the artist as real persona. Then, the flat and empty canvas functions to him as an accomplice, as the very Derridean palimpsest upon which a demonstration of that existence of the Self’s real Other can be done, simply by allowing one to erase any semblance of his Self’s conclusiveness. As proof of this Alien Other’s existence within each of us, Naval mentions the fact that our memories are not always called; mostly they just come, in spite of our Selves. By kowtowing to the memory’s near-independence, he says, he is able to attain the authentic. Painting to him, then, is a process of thinking, not an affair for the declaration of conclusions.
    Thus he finds kinship with cave art and the likes of Robert Motherwell, Antoni Tŕpies, Cy Twombly, etc. Artists whose art today, in the era of skills display, elicit guffaws? Well, we have to acknowledge the fact, Naval says, that “we’re actually more affected by (those pieces of) art we don’t like.” He considers it an ideal to paint not what one sees in life but, rather, how one looks at life.


Poch Naval, Child's Play, 2017, mixed media, 26" x 40"


Poch Naval, Poets, Seafarers and Spacemen Navigate Using the Stars, 2017, acrylic on canvas, 39.5" x 39.5"


Poch Naval, Night Sounds, 2017, acrylic on canvas, 27.5" x 19.75"


Poch Naval, Adagio, 2017, acrylic on canvas, 36" x 48"

 

It’s almost ironic that Naval, the social scientist painter, would rally this small group to celebrate wonderment and naiveté over overconfident (simple-headed) commentary, and—in Cinco’s case—to celebrate an Other’s pride and purity over our Selves’ colonized (or virus-invaded) beauty. But, like we said, anthropology has not survived because of judgmentalism or a missionary’s vision; It continues to thrive as a science because of an almost artistic wonderment towards all things Other. [d]

 


 

------------------------------------------------------------
Text (c) 2017 diskurso art magazine. All rights reserved. Photos by Jojo Soria de Veyra and AltroMondo Arte Contemporanea.

 

 

 


HOME | DOING AWAY WITH THE "ISSUE" | THE PREVIOUS SERIES/VOLUMES | ABOUT US | CONTACT US


 

LIKE/SUBSCRIBE:

 

   

 

© 2014-2016 diskurso art magazine online. all rights reserved.

diskurso is an independent, Philippines-based online magazine on art aiming to veer away from a present mental landscape replete with the customary peacock and weasel words that continue to service the art industry.